这是阅读清单而非可运行代码库,没有安装步骤;分类依据仓库自定的架构定义,可能与论文作者自称的类别不一致;清单为精选而非穷尽收录,未覆盖的论文不代表不存在
多模态模型综述与精选清单,按架构范式分类,帮你快速定位 MLLM、UMM、NMM 相关工作
汇总多模态建模相关资源,覆盖多模态大模型(MLLM)、统一多模态模型(UMM)和原生多模态模型(NMM),方便快速查找论文与工具。
核心能力
- 按架构优先原则划分传统融合、MLLM、UMM、NMM 四类
- 区分 UMM 的 U+G 统一与 NMM 的架构和训练耦合
- 以图像+文本为主,视频音频与 Omni 模型单独标注
- 单列基准评测、代码工具与综述论文资源章节
- 记录首次公开日期与权重、API 可用状态
容易踩的坑
暂无 release 数据(可能没有发版,或尚未同步)。
用户点评
登录用户的真实使用记录,可按版本和硬件筛选还没有人点评。第一个说出真实体验的人最有价值。
Awesome Multimodal Modeling
📢 News
- [2026-10-19] Updated the curated model and design-analysis coverage; added a dedicated Benchmarks & Evaluation section and matching website collection, with explicit date and release-status qualifications.
- [2026-06-06] 🚀 We released two new open-source model collections:
- Unified Multimodal Model Zoo (UMM Zoo) – a curated collection of unified multimodal models for understanding, generation, reasoning, and editing.
- Native Multimodal Model Zoo (NMM Zoo) – a curated collection of native multimodal models that natively integrate perception, reasoning, and generation.
- [2026-04-13] ⭐ The repository has already gained over 100 stars in just one day! Thank you all for the incredible support. We will keep updating this list with more cutting-edge models and resources. Your continued stars and PRs are warmly welcomed!
- [2026-04-12] 🎉 We are excited to launch Awesome Multimodal Modeling — a curated reading list organized by architectural paradigms. A comprehensive survey paper is coming soon! Stay tuned.
Table of Contents
- Awesome Multimodal Modeling
- 📢 News
- Table of Contents
- About This List
- 1. Introduction & Definitions
- 2. Traditional Multimodal Models
- 3. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
- 4. Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs)
- 5. Native Multimodal Models (NMMs)
- 6. Closed-Source Multimodal Models
- 7. Resources
- How to Contribute
- Citation
- License
About This List
In this section: At a Glance · Curation Principles
This repository provides a structured, community-maintained survey of multimodal models, covering the full evolutionary arc from early fusion methods to today's natively-trained omni-models. We emphasize precise architectural definitions and classification, especially for the often-conflated categories of Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) and Native Multimodal Models (NMMs).
Scope: Primary focus on image + text modalities; audio/video/3D are annotated where present. Omni/any-to-any models are marked with Omni.
At a Glance
| Dimension | Coverage |
|---|---|
| Primary scope | Image + text multimodal models, with explicit annotations for video, audio, and omni extensions |
| Core taxonomy | Traditional multimodal models, MLLMs, UMMs, and NMMs with explicit architecture/training qualifications |
| Key distinction | U+G unification for UMMs; architectural and optimization coupling for NMMs, with overlapping membership allowed |
| What makes this repo different | Architecture-first categorization, fusion-aware definitions, and curated links to adjacent awesome lists |
| Intended audience | Researchers, students, and engineers building or surveying multimodal systems |
Curation Principles
Coverage audit: the additions and release-status updates in this revision were checked against primary sources through 2026-10-19. This is a curated selection, not an exhaustive index of every paper published by that date.
| Principle | Rule |
|---|---|
| Source quality | Prefer official conference proceedings, OpenReview, ACL Anthology, CVF Open Access, arXiv, and official project pages |
| Classification policy | Category assignment is based on this repository's architecture-first definitions, which may differ from authors' own branding |
| Venue policy | Prefer the published venue; label author-reported acceptances where proceedings have not been checked. Keep first-paper dates separate from conference years |
| Date policy | First public: YYYY-MM-DD records the earliest verified exact-date public announcement; retain month precision where only a month is known. Distinguish paper submission, API availability, weights release and revision dates. Website year filters use the venue/release year; chronological sorting uses the explicit first-public date where recorded, otherwise the dated venue/release |
| Availability policy | Distinguish code, downloadable weights, API previews and future promises; record model-weight licenses separately from code licenses |
| Scope discipline | Models, benchmarks, datasets, and analysis papers are tracked separately to avoid mixing artifacts |
| Inclusion bar | We prioritize landmark papers, broadly adopted benchmarks, open implementations, or papers that clarify important taxonomy boundaries |
Classification note: for ambiguous models sitting between
MLLM,UMM, andNMM, this list records the category that best matches the training recipe and architectural coupling, not just the paper title. Architecture-native and training-native qualifications distinguish fusion structure from training history.
1. Introduction & Definitions
In this section: 1.1 Multimodal Model Evolution Stages · 1.2 Scope & Taxonomy · 1.3 Architecture Diagrams
1.1 Multimodal Model Evolution Stages
Subtopics: Traditional Multimodal Models · Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) · Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs) · Native Multimodal Models (NMMs)
We use the following precise, architecture-first definitions throughout this list. Understanding these distinctions is critical for correctly classifying modern models.
Traditional Multimodal Models
Pre-2023 mainstream era
Representation alignment or fusion of modality-specific processing streams, without a large language model backbone. Covers cross-modal retrieval, classification and captioning; alignment-only dual encoders and models with joint fusion layers are distinguished by their architectures. Examples: CLIP, ALIGN, ViLBERT, BLIP.
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
Pretrained-backbone multimodal language models
Combine a pretrained visual backbone or visual abstractor (e.g., ViT/CLIP/SigLIP, Q-Former, cross-attention adapter) with a pretrained LLM through a connector. The defining property is inheritance from strong pretrained unimodal backbones rather than joint multimodal pretraining from scratch. These models are primarily text-output understanding/reasoning systems, even when auxiliary generators are attached externally.
Key characteristics:
- ✅ Pretrained visual encoder / abstractor
- ✅ Pretrained LLM backbone
- ✅ Connector layer or cross-attention bridge
- ❌ No end-to-end multimodal pretraining from scratch
- ❌ No native image generation inside the same backbone
Examples: LLaVA, Qwen-VL, InternVL, MiniCPM-V, CogVLM
Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs)
Single framework for Understanding + Generation (U+G)
A single framework that handles both multimodal understanding and visual generation. UMMs may reuse pretrained components or modular tokenizers; the defining feature is U+G unification, not whether the model is trained from scratch.
Key characteristics:
- ✅ Unified understanding + generation
- ✅ Shared model interface or shared backbone for U+G
- ⚠️ May use pretrained components
- ⚠️ May use decoupled encoders / modular tokenizers
- ⚠️ If a model is also natively trained from scratch, its architectural details belong primarily in NMMs (§5)
Examples: Show-o, Janus, OpenUni, BAGEL, BLIP3-o
Native Multimodal Models (NMMs)
Architectural integration and multimodal optimization
NMMs are described along two dimensions: architectural nativity captures how early and persistently modalities share core computation; optimization nativity captures when multimodal objectives enter training and which core parameters they optimize. Entries that establish only one dimension are qualified as architecture-native or training-native. Training from scratch provides strong optimization evidence, but is not assumed for every entry. UMM and NMM membership can overlap.
Key characteristics:
- ✅ Fusion structure and training history are recorded separately
- ✅ Pretrained components and initialization are annotated per model
- ✅ Architecture-native entries may inherit pretrained backbones
- ✅ Input: text tokens + image patches/tokens
- ✅ Output: text (understanding focus; generation optional)
NMMs are described by fusion topology and input architecture, with initialization recorded separately. §5.2 records supported early-fusion architectures; §5.3 groups encoder-based systems without inferring fusion depth from encoder presence. Training-native entries without a confirmed architectural grouping are listed separately in §5.5:
NMM — Early Fusion
Modality tokens or embeddings enter shared core computation before the first shared backbone block. Separate tokenizers, input encoders, modality-specific experts, or output decoders can remain; their presence does not by itself imply late fusion.
- Shared backbone computation over multimodal states
- Discrete tokens, continuous latents, or pixel patches
- Modality interaction from the first shared block
- Initialization and trainable components annotated separately
- Examples: Chameleon, Emu3, Transfusion; Show-o, Show-o2, OneCat, and Llama 4 carry architecture-native qualifications
NMM — Late Fusion
Cross-modal interaction begins only after modality-specific backbone layers, rather than at the first shared block. This is a claim about where modalities interact, independent of whether the components were pretrained or initialized from scratch.
- Identify the modality-specific stages and the first interaction layer
- Record initialization and multimodal optimization separately
- A dedicated vision encoder alone does not establish this topology; encoder-based systems with unverified fusion depth are grouped in §5.3
1.2 Scope & Taxonomy
Multimodal Models
├── 2. Traditional Multimodal Models
│ ├── 2.1 Multimodal Representations & Alignment
│ │ ├── Multimodal Representations
│ │ ├── Multimodal Fusion
│ │ └── Multimodal Alignment
│ └── 2.2 Multimodal Pretraining
├── 3. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
│ ├── 3.1 Taxonomy Based on Vision Adapter
│ └── 3.2 Omni MLLMs
├── 4. Unified Multimodal Models (UMMs)
│ ├── 4.1 Taxonomy by Generation Paradigm
│ │ ├── Diffusion-Based UMMs
│ │ ├── Autoregressive (AR) UMMs
│ │ │ ├── Pixel Encoding
│ │ │ ├── Semantic Encoding
│ │ │ ├── Learnable Query Encoding
│ │ │ ├── Hybrid Encoding (Pseudo)
│ │ │ └── Hybrid Encoding (Joint)
│ │ └── Hybrid (AR + Diffusion) UMMs
│ │ ├── Pixel Encoding
│ │ └── Hybrid Encoding
│ ├── 4.2 Any-to-Any / Omni UMMs
│ └── 4.3 Related Generators (U+G Unverified)
└── 5. Native Multimodal Models (NMMs)
├── 5.1 Design Analyses & Scaling Laws
├── 5.2 Early Fusion NMMs
├── 5.3 Encoder-Based NMMs
├── 5.4 Any-to-Any / Omni NMMs
└── 5.5 Training-Native Models
1.3 Architecture Diagrams
The NMM diagrams below distinguish fusion topology from input architecture. The early-fusion diagram illustrates a from-scratch variant; initialization and input interfaces are specified per model in §5. Encoder-based entries do not inherit a strict late-fusion label from these schematic examples.
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ TRADITIONAL MULTIMODAL MODEL │
│ │
│ [Image] ──► [CNN/ViT Encoder] ──┐ │
│ ├──► [Fusion] ──► [Output] │
│ [Text] ──► [LSTM/BERT] ──┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ MLLM — PRETRAINED BACKBONES + VISUAL INTERFACE │
│ │
│ [Image] ──► [Pretrained ViT/CLIP] ──► [Projector/Q-Former] │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ [Text] ──────────────────────────► [Pretrained LLM] ──► [Text]│
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ UMM — UNIFIED UNDERSTANDING + GENERATION │
│ │
│ [Image/Text Input] ──► [Shared/Modular Tokenizer] │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ [Unified Transformer] │
│ │ │ │
│ ▼ ▼ │
│ [Text Output] [Image Output] │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NMM — EARLY FUSION (Trained from Scratch) │
│ │
│ [Text tokens] ──┐ │
│ └──► [Single Decoder Transformer] ──► [Text] │
│ [Image patches ──► Linear Patchify] ──┘ │
│ (raw pixels, minimal preprocessing) │
│ Multimodal interaction from Layer 1 │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ NMM — ENCODER-BASED INPUT ARCHITECTURE │
│ │
│ [Image] ──► [Vision Encoder] ──► [Visual Interface] │
│ │ │
│ ▼ │
│ [Text] ──────────────────────► [Backbone] ──► [Text] │
│ Initialization and first interaction layer recorded per model │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
2. Traditional Multimodal Models
In this section: 2.1 Multimodal Representations & Alignment · 2.2 Multimodal Pretraining
Pre-chat-MLLM and non-native multimodal systems that established the basic vocabulary of alignment, fusion, retrieval, captioning, and multimodal pretraining.
2.1 Multimodal Representations & Alignment
Subtopics: Multimodal Representations · Multimodal Fusion · Multimodal Alignment
Multimodal Representations
| Paper | Venue | Links | Notes | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identifiability Results for Multimodal Contrastive Learning | ICLR 2023 | Paper | Theoretical identifiability analysis of contrastive multimodal learning | representation learning |
| Unpaired Vision-Language Pre-training via Cross-Modal CutMix | ICML 2022 | Paper | Introduces CutMix-style augmentation for unpaired VLP | vision-language pretraining |
| Balanced Multimodal Learning via On-the-fly Gradient Modulation | CVPR 2022 | Paper | Balances modality learning via dynamic gradient reweighting | multimodal optimization |
| FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Model | arXiv 2021 | Paper | Unified architecture for vision-language understanding and generation | foundation multimodal model |
| UniT: Multimodal Multitask Learning with a Unified Transformer | arXiv 2021 | Paper | Single transformer for multiple multimodal tasks | multimodal multitask learning |
| Perceiver: General Perception with Iterative Attention | ICML 2021 | Paper | General-purpose architecture for high-dimensional multimodal inputs | general multimodal architecture |
| Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision | ICML 2021 | Paper | Contrastive vision-language pretraining at scale | vision-language contrastive learning |
| VinVL: Revisiting Visual Representations in Vision-Language Models | arXiv 2021 | Paper | Improved visual features for VL tasks | vision-language representation improvement |
| 12-in-1: Multi-Task Vision and Language Representation Learning | CVPR 2020 | Paper | Unified multi-task learning across 12 VL tasks | multi-task learning |
| Learning Video Representations using Contrastive Bidirectional Transformer | arXiv 2019 | Paper | Contrastive transformer for video representation learning | video contrastive learning |
| OmniNet: A Unified Architecture for Multi-modal Multi-task Learning | arXiv 2019 | Paper | Unified encoder-decoder for multimodal tasks | unified multimodal architecture |
| Learning Representations by Maximizing Mutual Information Across Views | arXiv 2019 | Paper | InfoMax principle for cross-view representation learning | self-supervised learning |
| ViCo: Word Embeddings from Visual Co-occurrences | ICCV 2019 | Paper | Learning word embeddings from visual context | vision-language embeddings |
| Learning Factorized Multimodal Representations | ICLR 2019 | Paper | Factorized latent space for multimodal data | representation disentanglement |
| Deep Fragment Embeddings for Bidirectional Image Sentence Mapping | NeurIPS 2014 | Paper | Fragment-level image-sentence alignment | vision-language alignment |
| DeViSE: A Deep Visual-Semantic Embedding Model | NeurIPS 2013 | Paper | Early deep vision-to-language embedding model | vision-language embedding |
| Multimodal Deep Learning | ICML 2011 | Paper | Foundational multimodal deep learning framework | multimodal deep learning |
Multimodal Fusion
| Paper | Venue | Links | Notes | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robust Contrastive Learning against Noisy Views | arXiv 2022 | Paper | Robust contrastive learning under noisy multi-view inputs | contrastive learning |
| Attention Bottlenecks for Multimodal Fusion | NeurIPS 2021 | Paper | Introduces bottleneck attention mechanism for efficient multimodal fusion | multimodal fusion |
| VMLoc: Variational Fusion For Learning-Based Multimodal Camera Localization | AAAI 2021 | Paper | Variational multimodal fusion for camera localization tasks | multimodal localization |
| Trusted Multi-View Classification | ICLR 2021 | Paper | Confidence-aware weighting for multi-view classification | multi-view classification |
| Deep-HOSeq: Deep Higher-Order Sequence Fusion for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis | ICDM 2020 | Paper | Higher-order sequence fusion for multimodal sentiment analysis | multimodal sentiment analysis |
| What Makes Training Multi-Modal Classification Networks Hard? | CVPR 2020 | Paper | Analyzes optimization challenges in multimodal classification | theoretical/empirical analysis |
| DeepCU: Integrating Both Common and Unique Latent Information for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis | IJCAI 2019 | Paper | Separates shared and private latent representations for fusion | multimodal sentiment analysis |
| XFlow: Cross-modal Deep Neural Networks for Audiovisual Classification | IEEE TNNLS 2019 | Paper | Cross-modal feature exchange network for audio-visual tasks | audio-visual classification |
| MFAS: Multimodal Fusion Architecture Search | CVPR 2019 | Paper | Neural architecture search for optimal multimodal fusion design | architecture search |
| The Neuro-Symbolic Concept Learner: Interpreting Scenes, Words, and Sentences From Natural Supervision | ICLR 2019 | Paper | Neuro-symbolic model combining perception and reasoning | neuro-symbolic learning |
| Efficient Low-rank Multimodal Fusion with Modality-Specific Factors | ACL 2018 | Paper | Low-rank factorization for efficient multimodal fusion | efficient fusion |
| Memory Fusion Network for Multi-view Sequential Learning | AAAI 2018 | Paper | Memory-based fusion across temporal multimodal sequences | sequential multimodal learning |
| Tensor Fusion Network for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis | EMNLP 2017 | Paper | Tensor-based full interaction modeling across modalities | multimodal sentiment analysis |
Multimodal Alignment
| Paper | Venue | Links | Notes | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LanguageBind: Extending Video-Language Pretraining to N-modality by Language-based Semantic Alignment | arXiv 2023 | Paper Code | Language-centered alignment across image, video, audio, depth, thermal, and IMU modalities | multimodal alignment |
| CLIP | ICML 2021 | Paper | 400M+ image-text pairs; dual-encoder (Vision Transformer + Text Transformer); contrastive alignment of separate image/text embeddings; no joint image-text backbone | zero-shot image classification, retrieval |
| CoMIR: Contrastive Multimodal Image Representation for Registration | NeurIPS 2020 | Paper | Contrastive learning for multimodal image registration alignment | multimodal alignment |
| Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequences | ACL 2019 | Paper | Transformer-based alignment for unaligned multimodal sequences | sequence alignment |
| Temporal Cycle-Consistency Learning | CVPR 2019 | Paper | Uses cycle-consistency for temporal cross-modal alignment | temporal alignment |
| Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis | ICML 2013 | Paper | Deep learning extension of CCA for cross-view representation alignment | representation alignment |
2.2 Multimodal Pretraining
| Paper | Venue | Links | Notes | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Align before Fuse: Vision and Language Representation Learning with Momentum Distillation | NeurIPS 2021 Spotlight | Paper | Momentum distillation for aligning vision-language representations before fusion | vision-language pretraining |
| Less is More: ClipBERT for Video-and-Language Learning via Sparse Sampling | CVPR 2021 | Paper | Sparse frame sampling for efficient video-language pretraining | video-language pretraining |
| UniT: Multimodal Multitask Learning with a Unified Transformer | arXiv 2021 | Paper | Unified transformer for multitask multimodal learning | unified multimodal pretraining |
| Large-Scale Adversarial Training for Vision-and-Language Representation Learning | NeurIPS 2020 | Paper | Adversarial training improves robustness of vision-language representations | robust multimodal pretraining |
| Vokenization: Improving Language Understanding with Contextualized, Visual-Grounded Supervision | EMNLP 2020 | Paper | Grounds language tokens in visual context via voken supervision | vision-grounded language modeling |
| Integrating Multimodal Information in Large Pretrained Transformers | ACL 2020 | Paper | Injects multimodal signals into large pretrained transformer architectures | multimodal transformer pretraining |
| VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representations | arXiv 2019 | Paper | Joint vision-language BERT-style pretraining | vision-language pretraining |
| VisualBERT: A Simple and Performant Baseline for Vision and Language | arXiv 2019 | Paper | Early unified transformer for vision-language understanding | vision-language pretraining |
| ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Tasks | NeurIPS 2019 | Paper | Two-stream transformer for cross-modal vision-language learning | vision-language pretraining |
| Unicoder-VL: A Universal Encoder for Vision and Language by Cross-modal Pre-training | arXiv 2019 | Paper | Cross-modal encoder for universal vision-language representations | vision-language pretraining |
| LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformers | EMNLP 2019 | Paper | Cross-modality transformer encoder for vision-language reasoning | vision-language pretraining |
| VideoBERT: A Joint Model for Video and Language Representation Learning | ICCV 2019 | Paper | Joint discrete token modeling for video and language | video-language pretraining |
3. Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
In this section: 3.1 Taxonomy Based on Vision Adapter · 3.2 Omni MLLMs
Models that connect a pretrained visual encoder / abstractor to a pretrained LLM. Primarily text-output understanding and reasoning systems, defined by inherited pretrained unimodal backbones rather than multimodal pretraining from scratch.
3.1 Taxonomy Based on Vision Adapter
These groups describe the vision-to-language interface, rather than attention variants inside the language backbone. MLP/Others includes linear projections, spatial merging and pixel shuffle; Q-Former covers query-transformer connectors; Cross-Attention refers to bridges attending to separate visual features. Hybrid Adaptor covers combinations such as learned pooling plus projection, or projection plus visual experts inside the language backbone.
MLP/Others Projector
| Paper | Venue | Links | Notes | Task |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WeVisDoc: From Coverage to Capability for Robust End-to-End Document Parsing | arXiv 2026-09-17 | Paper Code HF | Paper first submitted: 2026-09-17. Fine-tunes Qwen3-VL-2B/4B-Instruct, retaining their visual encoder and merger/projector; page images and instructions produce structured Markdown, LaTeX formulas and HTML tables. Coverage-driven and residual-error-driven training target degraded documents. Code and 2B/4B checkpoints available as of 2026-10-19. | document parsing, OCR, table/formula recognition, robustness |
| VideoScout: Learning Agentic Active Exploration with Adaptive Reasoning Pacing for Long Video Understanding | arXiv 2026-09-14 | Paper | Paper first submitted: 2026-09-14. Qwen2.5-VL-7B initialization retains its vision encoder and projector; SFT and trajectory-level DAPO learn adaptive viewing speed, revisiting and note taking for long-video answers. Text/video input produces text and viewing actions; code and checkpoint release not established in the checked primary source as of 2026-10-19. | long-video understanding, active exploration, temporal reasoning |
| LFM2.5-VL-3B | Model release 2026-08-12 | Announcement HF Implementation | First public: 2026-08-12. Pretrained LFM2.5-2.6B with SigLIP2 NaFlex 400M, pixel-unshuffle and a two-layer MLP projector; text/image/multi-image inputs produce text, grounding coordinates and tool calls. Weights and inference implementations available under the Liquid AI model license; aimed at low-latency edge use. | image understanding, multi-image reasoning, OCR, grounding, tool use, edge deployment |
| PaddleOCR-VL-1.6: Expanding the Frontier of Document Parsing with Under-Optimized Region Refinement and Progressive Post-Training | arXiv 2026-06-02 | Paper Code HF | First public: 2026-05-28 (weights); paper first submitted 2026-06-02. 0.9B document VLM retaining the 1.5 native-resolution encoder, adaptive MLP connector and ERNIE language backbone; region refinement and progressive post-training improve recognition. Document-image/text inputs produce structured text, tables, formulas and spotting coordinates. Code and weights available. | document parsing, multilingual OCR, tables, formulas, text spotting |
| PaddleOCR-VL-1.5: Towards a Multi-Task 0.9B VLM for Robust In-the-Wild Document Parsing | arXiv 2026-01-29 | Paper Code HF | First public: 2026-01-29 (paper and weights). 0.9B VLM combines a native-resolution visual encoder, adaptive MLP connector and ERNIE-4.5-0.3B; document-image/text inputs produce structured text and localized recognition. Adds seal recognition, text spotting and robustness training; full page parsing uses the accompanying layout pipeline. Code and Apache-2.0 checkpoints available. | document parsing, multilingual OCR, seal recognition, text spotting |
| GLM-4.6V / GLM-4.6V-Flash | Model release 2025-12-08 | Announcement Code HF Flash | First public: 2025-12-08. 106B and 9B vision-language variants with 128K trained context; visual patch merging and gated MLP projection connect the vision path to the language backbone. Text/image/video inputs produce text and tool calls, with visual observations passed directly to tools. Code and MIT-licensed weights available; native tool use does not establish from-scratch multimodal training. | image/video understanding, document understanding, visual tool use |
| SmolVLM2 | Model release 2025-02-20 | Announcement HF Paper | First public: 2025-02-20. Video-trained 256M, 500M and 2.2B family extending the SigLIP/SmolLM projector design; text/image/multi-image/video inputs produce text. Uses video/image training mixtures and efficient visual compression for device deployment. Checkpoints and inference/fine-tuning support available under Apache 2.0; the shared family report was submitted 2025-04-07. | image/video understanding, multi-image reasoning, efficiency, on-device deployment |
| Idefics3 | arXiv 2024 | Paper HF | SigLIP vision encoder with pixel-shuffle spatial compression and projection to a Llama 3 backbone; replaces Idefics2’s Perceiver resampler. | visual understanding, document understanding |
| MiniMax-01: Scaling Foundation Models with Lightning Attention | arXiv 2025 | Paper | MiniMax-VL-01 uses a 303M ViT, a two-layer MLP visual projector and MiniMax-Text-01; Lightning/Softmax hybrid attention describes the language backbone. | visual understanding |
| VideoJev: System One Model for Video Understanding and Interaction | arXiv 2026 | Paper Code | 4B / 35B-A3B; initialized from Qwen3.5-4B / Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, retaining their pretrained ViT, visual projection and language backbone; candidate-scoring heads unify temporal grounding and multiple-choice QA. | video QA, temporal grounding |
| Video-o3: Native Interleaved Clue Seeking for Long Video Multi-Hop Reasoning | ICML 2026 | Paper Code | Qwen2.5-VL-7B (also Qwen3-VL-4B); inherits the pretrained Qwen ViT, visual projector and language backbone; interleaves reasoning with VideoCrop tool calls and learns from SFT plus trajectory-guided RL. | long-video reasoning, visual tool use |
| VideoChat3: Fully Open Video MLLM for Efficient and Generalist Video Understanding | arXiv 2026 | Paper Code | 4B; I3D-ViT initialized from image-pretrained MoonViT, with a lightweight projector and Qwen3-4B text backbone; spatiotemporal visual compression supports generalist offline and proactive streaming understanding. | video understanding, temporal grounding, proactive streaming |
| TimeLens2: Generalist Video Temporal Grounding with Multimodal LLMs | arXiv 2026 | Paper Code | 2B / 4B / 8B; inherits the pretrained Qwen3-VL ViT, visual projector and language backbones; verified SFT and temporal-grounding GRPO adapt them to generalist interval localization. | video temporal grounding |
| OneStreamer: Unifying Perception, Memory, and Proactive Response in Streaming Video Interaction | arXiv 2026 | Paper Code | 4B; initialized from Qwen3-VL-4B-Instruct with its pretrained vision encoder frozen and the multimodal projector and language model fine-tuned; hierarchical caption memory and control states support proactive streaming interaction. | streaming video understanding, memory, proactive response |
| Ling-3.0-flash-VL | Model release 2026 | HF | Open-weight VLM (MIT) extending Ling-3.0-flash with a ViT and a two-layer MLP projector; supports image and video inputs with text outputs. BF16 and quantized checkpoints belong to the same model entry | image/video understanding, document understanding, visual reasoning, GUI agents |
| LLaDA-UI | Model release 2026 | Code HF | SigLIP-initialized native-resolution ViT connects to LLaDA2.0-mini-base through spatial 4-to-1 feature grouping and a two-layer MLP; block-wise diffusion generates text reasoning and GUI actions. Code and weights are available; checkpoint license is unspecified in the model card as of 2026-09-15 | screenshot understanding, GUI grounding, mobile/desktop/web agents |
| Muse Glimmer-30B | Model release 2026 | HF Implementation | Open-weight 30B model (Apache 2.0), distilled from Muse Spark; a dedicated Perception Encoder connects to the language backbone through an MLP adapter and linear projection; text and image inputs, text outputs | visual understanding, visual reasoning, coding, agentic tool use |
| DiffusionGemma | Google DeepMind, 2026 | Model Card HF Implementation | Open-weight Gemma 4-based model (Apache 2.0); normalized visual features enter the language model through a linear projection, while an encoder-decoder architecture uses block-wise discrete diffusion for text generation. Image/video understanding with text output; no native image generation | visual understanding, video understanding, reasoning, efficient text generation |
| Mistral Medium 3.5 | Mistral AI, 2026 | Announcement HF Implementation | Open-weight 128B dense VLM under a Modified MIT license; a from-scratch vision encoder connects through a patch merger and MLP projector to the language backbone. Supports text/image inputs and text outputs; whole-model from-scratch multimodal training is not established | visual understanding, reasoning, coding, long-horizon agents |
| Mage-VL: An Efficient Codec-Native Streaming Multimodal Foundation Model | arXiv 2026 | Paper Project Model | 4B codec-native streaming VLM combining a from-scratch Mage-ViT visual encoder, two-layer MLP projector, and pretrained Qwen3-4B-Instruct-2507 decoder; codec-guided token selection reduces visual tokens by over 75% | image/video understanding, long video, proactive streaming |
| StepX-Edge: An On-Device UI Vision-Language Model via Architecture-Training-Deployment Co-Design | arXiv 2026 | Paper | 0.9B on-device UI VLM with UI-aware layered visual encoding and a progressive dimensionality projection connector; quantized deployment is validated on Snapdragon 8 Gen5 | UI understanding, OCR, grounding, on-device deployment |
| MiniCPM-V 4.5: Cooking Efficient MLLMs via Architecture, Data, and Training Recipe | arXiv 2025 | Paper Code Model | Efficient 8B MLLM built with Qwen3-8B, SigLIP2-400M and a unified 3D-Resampler for compact image-video encoding | visual understanding, document/OCR, video understanding, edge deployment |
| Moondream 3.1 | Model Release 2026 | Project Model | Efficient sparse MoE VLM with 9B total and 2B active parameters; supports visual reasoning, query, caption, detection, pointing and segmentation | visual understanding, grounding, segmentation, edge deployment |
| LLaVA-OneVision-1.5: Fully Open Framework for Democratized Multimodal Training | arXiv 2025 | Paper Code HF | 4B / 8B; 85M mid-training data + 22M instruction data; ViT–MLP–LLM architecture with pretrained RICE-ViT, a two-layer MLP projector, and Qwen3 backbone; supports image, multi-image, and video | visual understanding, video |
| SAIL-VL2 Technical Report | arXiv 2025 | Paper | Open-suite 2B/8B vision-language foundation model with SAIL-ViT, progressive multimodal training, SFT-RL thinking fusion, and strong image/video reasoning across 106 datasets | visual understanding, video, reasoning |
| Kwai Keye-VL 2.0 Technical Report | arXiv 2026 | Paper | achieves state-of-the-art performance among models of similar scale, particularly excelling in fine-grained temporal localization | video understanding |
| Penguin-VL: Exploring the Efficiency Limits of VLM with LLM-based Vision Encoders | arXiv 2026 | Paper | LLM-initialized vision encoder (non-CLIP); text-to-vision weight reuse, generative-aligned visual features, optimized for dense perception. | visual understanding |
| Youtu-VL: Unleashing Visual Potential via Unified Vision-Language Supervision | arXiv 2026 | Paper | SigLIP2 vision encoder with 2×2 Spatial Merge and a two-layer MLP projector to Youtu-LLM; unified autoregressive supervision over visual and text targets supports fine-grained understanding and dense prediction. | visual understanding, grounding, segmentation, depth estimation |
| STEP3-VL-10B Technical Report | arXiv 2026 | Paper | 10B-scale foundation multimodal; unified unfrozen pre-training + PaCoRe test-time scaling, frontier-level reasoning with compact footprint. | visual understanding |
| GLM-OCR | arXiv 2026 | Paper | GLM-OCR is an efficient 0.9B-parameter compact multimodal model designed for real-world document understanding. | OCR, structured extraction |
| Kimi K2.5 | arXiv 2026 | Paper | joint text-vision pretraining, Agent Swarm framework; coding, vision, reasoning, agentic tasks; reduces latency by up to 4.5x | visual agentic intelligence, agentic, reasoning |
| Kwai Keye-VL 1.5 Technical Report | arXiv 2025 | Paper | Adaptive Slow-Fast encoding; 8B parameter scale with 128K long-context; SOTA video reasoning & human-preference aligned. | visual understanding |
| olmOCR / olmOCR-2 | arXiv 2025 | Paper | Efficient low-VRAM OCR model based on Qwen2.5-VL fine-tune; excels at preserving semantic structure and markdown output | OCR, structured extraction |
| PaddleOCR-VL: Boosting Multilingual Document Parsing via a 0.9B Ultra-Compact Vision-Language Model | arXiv 2025-10-16 | Paper Code HF | Paper first submitted: 2025-10-16. Original 0.9B document VLM with a NaViT-style dynamic-resolution encoder, adaptive MLP connector and ERNIE-4.5-0.3B; document-image/text inputs produce multilingual text, table, formula and chart representations. Code and weights available; later 1.5 and 1.6 releases are listed separately. | OCR, multilingual document parsing |
| DeepSeek-OCR | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | Lightweight ~3B MoE vision model optimized for high-volume OCR, document digitization, charts and formulas; efficient inference | OCR, document |
| Kimi-VL | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | Projector + MoE backbone; long video/PDF/GUI, agentic capabilities, chain-of-thought vision reasoning | visual understanding, agentic, video |
| Seed1.5-VL Technical Report | arXiv 2025 | Paper | 20B MoE + 532M ViT; native-resolution vision-language foundation model; efficient asymmetric architecture. | visual understanding |
| Qwen3-VL | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | Frontier-grade vision/OCR (32+ languages), video analysis, agentic capabilities, strong multimodal reasoning; includes large MoE variants (e.g., 235B) | visual understanding, video, omni |
| SmolVLM: Redefining small and efficient multimodal models | arXiv 2025-04-07 | Paper Announcement HF 256M | First public: 2024-11-26 (original release); family paper submitted 2025-04-07. Compact image-first SigLIP/SmolLM family using pixel-shuffle compression and projection; text/image/multi-image inputs produce text, with sampled-frame video explored in the original release. Code and Apache-2.0 checkpoints available; SmolVLM2 separately records dedicated video training and release. | visual understanding, efficiency, on-device deployment |
| LLaDA-V: Large Language Diffusion Models with Visual Instruction Tuning | arXiv 2025 | Paper | Diffusion LLM as LLM backbone; vision encoder: SigLIP | visual understanding |
| jina-vlm | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | SigLIP2 + Qwen backbone with custom projector; optimized for semantic VQA, diagrams, scans and document semantics | visual understanding, VQA, document |
| Phi-4-Multimodal | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | Small-parameter (LoRA + projectors) multimodal; vision + speech support, efficient on-device deployment | visual understanding, on-device |
| Molmo / PixMo | CVPR 2025 | Paper Code | Strong open-data/open-weight VLM pipeline | visual understanding |
| FastVLM: Efficient Vision Encoding for Vision Language Models | CVPR 2025 | Paper | efficient multimodal visual encoding for on-device deployment | visual understanding, on-device |
| Qwen2.5-VL: Technical Report | arXiv 2025 | Paper HF | Stronger document, grounding, and video capabilities | visual understanding |
| General OCR Theory: Towards OCR-2.0 via a Unified End-to-end Model | arXiv 2024 | Paper HF/Code | Specialized end-to-end OCR model with grounding (boxes + points); strong on scientific papers, slides, and mixed visual-text docs | OCR, grounding |
| LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfer | arXiv 2024 | Paper Code | Single model for image, multi-image, and video transfer | visual understanding |
| MiniCPM-V: A GPT-4V Level MLLM on Your Phone | arXiv 2024 | Paper Code | On-device efficient MLLM | visual understanding |
| NVILA: Efficient Frontier Visual Language Models | CVPR 2025 | Paper | Efficient general purpose multimodal LLM; spatial and temporal "Scale then compress" design; vision encoder: SigLIP | visual understanding |
| GLM-4V | arXiv 2024 | Paper | ViT-based vision encoder (EVA-02-CLIP-L); high-resolution input support (up to 1120x1120) via image tiling and a visual interface to the language model, optimized for document and OCR tasks | visual understanding |
| xGen-MM (BLIP-3) | arXiv 2024 | Paper | Open training recipe, datasets, and safety-tuned variants | visual understanding |
| DeepSeek-VL2: Mixture-of-Experts Vision-Language Models | arXiv 2024 | Paper Code | MoE VLM with dynamic tiling and efficient inference | visual understanding |
| Pixtral | arXiv 2024 | Paper HF | 12B open-weight model with strong instruction following, image+text understanding; competitive with larger open VLMs | visual understanding |
| Qwen2-VL | arXiv 2024 | Paper HF | Dynamic resolution; native video | visual understanding |
| Cambrian-1: A Fully Open, Vision-Centric Exploration | NeurIPS 2024 | Paper Code | Spatial Vision Aggregator | visual understanding |
| PaliGemma: A Versatile 3B VLM for Transfer | arXiv 2024 | Paper HF | SigLIP encoder + Gemma backbone; strong transfer model | visual understanding |
| InternLM-XComposer2 | arXiv 2024 | Paper Code | Compositional visual grounding | visual understanding |
| Phi-3-Vision | arXiv 2024 | Paper [HF](https://huggingface.co/microsoft/Phi-3-v |